Wednesday, May 01, 2013

Horizontal Boundaries of a Firm


Horizontal Boundaries of a Firm

 Some important questions that any manager/firm operator must ask are:

1)    How do we define our firm? 

2)    What activities do we do?

3)    What are our firm’s boundaries?

The horizontal boundaries of the firm refer to the size (how much of the total product market will the firm serve) and scope (what variety of products and services does the firm produce).  The horizontal boundaries of a firm depend critically on economies of scale and scope.
 
Economies of scale and scope are present whenever large-scale production, distribution, or retail processes provide a cost advantage over small processes. 
 
Economies of scale exist whenever the average cost per unit of output falls as the volume of output increases. 
 
Economies of scope exist whenever the total cost of producing two different products or services is lower when a single firm instead of two separate firms produces them.  In essences, cost savings associated with increasing the variety of activities in goods produced.
 
In general, capital intensive production processes are more likely to display economies of scale and scope than are labor or materials intensive processes.  By offering cost advantages, economies of scale and scope not only affect the sizes of firms and the structure of markets, they also shape critical business strategy decisions, such as whether independent firms should merge and whether a firm can achieve long-term cost advantages in the market through expansion.

 
Economies of SCALE & SCOPE come from 4 major sources
 
1) Indivisibility & Spreading of fixed costs

Input cannot be scaled down below a certain size.

Shipping 100 or 1000 lbs by rail requires some inputs.
 
2) Productivity of variable inputs (specialization). 

Specialisation in a task.

3) Inventories
     
Stock out costs vs. costs of carrying inventory.
 
4) Cube square rule
  
Production capacity is proportional to the volume of production vessel, whereas  TC is proportional to surface area. Thus, As capacity rises, AC of production capacity goes down because the ratio of Surface area to volume decreases.

 Advantages of Economies of Scale & Scope

It gives large firms the advantage.
 
Firms can expand in a number of ways.
 
Internal Expansion strategies depend upon: retained earnings, equity and debt.

External Strategies depend upon: formalizing relationships with other firms     MERGERS

Market structure refers to: the number and size distribution of firms.
 
Some Definitions:

Product-Level Economies of Scale: reductions in unit cost attributable to producing more of a given product in a given plant.

Short-run Economies of Scale: reductions in unit cost attributable to spreading fixed costs for a plant of a given size.  These arise because of increased utilization of a plant of a given capacity.

Long-run Economies of Scale: reductions in unit costs attributable to a firm switching from a low fixed/high variable cost plant to a high fixed/low variable cost plant.  These arise due to adoption of technologies or larger plants that have higher fixed costs but lower variable costs.  The distinction between long and short-run scale is very important---mistaking short-run economies of scale for long-run economies could lead a firm to the false conclusion that its unit costs will continue to fall if it expands capacity once its existing capacity is full.   

Product-Level Economies of Scope: reductions in unit cost attributable to a firm’s diversification into several products produced in the same plant.  Examples include any process in which there are chemical by-products from the same reaction such as crop rotation and oil refining.  Another example is a product that shares a key component or set of components whose production is characterized by economies of scale, such as digital watches and electronic calculators.  A final example is a firm that utilizes off peak capacity such as ski resorts, garden stores, and sporting goods stores.

 Plant-Level Economies of Scope: reductions in unit cost attributable to a firm’s diversification into several products produced in different plants.  Examples include airline hub-and-spoke systems.

Purchasing Economies: reductions in unit cost attributable to volume discounts.  Large volume buyers may be able to achieve quantity discounts that are not available to smaller-volume buyers.  Examples include hospital and hardware store purchasing groups. E.G Buying in bulk.

R&D Economies: reductions in unit cost due to spreading R&D expenses.  For example, R&D labs require a minimum number of scientists and researchers whose labor is indivisible.   As the output of the lab expands, R&D costs per unit may fall. In essences, the use nature of R&D suggests a minimum feasible size for an R&D Dept. E.G - spill overs: R& D in one area leads to a new product in a different area.
 
Marketing Economies:
 
1)    Economies of scale due to spreading advertising expenditures over larger markets

2)    Economies of scope due to building a reputation of one product in the product line benefiting other products as well.  For example, Budweiser’s cost per effective message is lower than Anchor Steam’s since Bud is widely available and its ads would thus have a higher impact.
 
3)     Reputation effects what you have in one product is implied for other. 

4)    Spreading Advertising Costs over larger markets.


Horizontal Boundaries: related to the variety of related products or services the firm sells.

Fixed Costs: costs that do not vary with output.

Indivisibility: some inputs cannot be scaled down below a certain minimum size, even as output shrinks to zero.  Examples include railroad and airline service.

Learning Curve: reductions in unit costs that result from the accumulation of know-how and experience. 

Core Competency: the collective know-how within an organization about how to work with particular technologies or particular types of product functionality (e.g. 3M in coatings and adhesives and Canon in precision mechanics, fine optics, and microelectronics).

Horizontal Boundaries 


Horizontal boundaries are those that define how much of the total product market the firm serves (size) and what variety of related products the firm offers (scope).  The basic question is: “What strategic advantages are conferred on a firm by being large or by having a broad scope of products?”  Size/scope can represent an advantage for three reasons.

·         Size = Market Power.  Larger/diversified firms may be able to exercise monopoly power or set the terms of competition for other firms in the industry.

·         Size = Entry Barriers.  Once a firm owns a large position in the market, it may be very difficult to dislodge it.  That is, potential entrants and existing firms may be deterred from attacking this firm’s core business.  A good example of this is brand proliferation in breakfast cereals.     

·         Size = Lower Unit Costs.  A large firm may be able to produce at a lower cost per unit than a small firm may.
Learning Curve

The difference between economies of scale and the learning curve relates to cumulative output, not levels of output.  For example, Lockheed pursued a learning curve strategy in building its L10-11 class of aircraft.  The firm anticipated that it would lose money by producing a lot of aircraft, gain experience, and finally achieve cost competitiveness in the industry.  The firm initially priced below its average cost and eventually cost fell to below price.  Lockheed was hard hit then with a “cheap to produce” aircraft when oil prices rose dramatically.  This particular firm lost this gamble because it banked on demand remaining high; the OPEC oil embargo changed the environment significantly enough so that they couldn’t benefit from their cost advantage.
 
Diseconomies

There are certainly limits to how big a firm can be and still produce efficiently.  For example, labour costs increase as firms get bigger (unionization, employees are less satisfied with their jobs, commuting time increases as the firm gets bigger because it draws from further away).  Smaller firms sometimes have an easier time motivating employees; moreover, rewards are much more closely linked to profits.  The trick is for the big firm to create the right motivations for workers.  Finally the source of your advantage may not be “spreadable.”  That is, a patent is not spreadable nor personal services such as in restaurants.
 
Sources of Diseconomies of Scale

Rising Labor Costs: - Larger firms, usually pay higher wages

Incentive & Bureaucracy Effects: - It is difficult for large firms to motivate workers.

Spreading Specialized Resources: - Too thin, Of a specialized input is the source of the firm's advantage, if the firm tries to expand without duplicating that resource, that resource becomes overburden.

Example:  Chief is big success in first restaurant, but fails as he tries to open others.  It was his cooking ability that was the key.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Resources-Based Strategic Options - Cost Reduction

Resources-Based Strategic Options - Cost Reduction Introduction With emergent of economy, strategic options are not longer focusi...